Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Future Motion, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 5, 2025No. 5:23-cv-06426Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 IN RE: FUTURE MOTION, INC. Case No. 5:23-md-03087-BLF 8 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 This Document Relates to: ENFORCE SETTLEMENT 10 Elliott v. Future Motion, Inc., [Re: MDL Dkt. No. 128; No. 23-cv-06426 11 No. 23-cv-06426-BLF Dkt. No. 23] 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Schuyler Elliott’s (“Elliott”) Opposed Motion to Enforce the 14 Parties’ Agreement to Settle. MDL Dkt. No. 128; No. 23-cv-06426 Dkt. No. 23 (“Mot.”). 15 Defendant Future Motion, Inc. (“Future Motion”)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robbie v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Blackhawk Heat. & P. Co., Inc. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Spiegel v. H. Allen Holmes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Cheverie v. GeisserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.