Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Lomar Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 1993No. 91-1664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

612 So.2d 707 (1993)

Sammie L. McCORMICK and Queen E. McCormick, Appellants,

v.

LOMAR INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida corporation and Goldome Credit Corporation, an Alabama Corporation, Appellees.

No. 91-1664.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 27, 1993.

Nancy Little Hoffmann of Nancy Little Hoffmann, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

No appearance for appellees.

LETTS, Judge.

The issue here is whether the trial judge abused her discretion when she struck all of the appellants'/plaintiffs' pleadings as a sanction for failure to comply with a request for production. We affirm.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garden-Aire Village Sea Haven, Inc. v. DeckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. USB Acquisition Co. v. US Block Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc. v. RadcliffeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Lahti v. PornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Schlitt v. CurrierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. HOBE SOUND RESTAURANT CORP., INC. v. SlaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Russell v. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API