Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Mayor

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1892Published

Application for injunction by John M. Cornell and others against the mayor,, aldermen, and commonalty of the city of New York. Denied^

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

This is an application in equity for an order restraining the-defendants pendente lite from using the premises or pier at the foot of West Thirtieth street, North river, or the bulkhead, dock, or lands adjacent thereto, for the purposes of a dumping ground for offal, or for the receipt for transportation of dead or diseased animals, offal, or any other putrid matter or material. The papers show that on the pier complained of there have been located a street-cleaning dump and the offal dock and dump; that the street-cleaning dump occupies the north side of the pier, nearest to Thirteenth aver…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noonan v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Griffin v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Cogswell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Morton v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Hill v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API