Legal Opinion

Kirland v. Stumph

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

— The appellant commenced three suits against appellees in the Superior Court of Marion County. They were consolidated, tried as one suit by the court, and judgment rendered for appellees.

An appeal was taken to the general term of said court, and by it the judgment at special term was in all things affirmed. An appeal was then taken to this court. ■

In this court, the appellant has assigned the same errors, and in the same manner, as he assigned them in the general term of the superior court, but has not assigned any error in the superior court at general term. Those errors have *515.al…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Manufacturing & Carpenters Union v. Cleveland, C., C., & I. Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Miller v. State, ex rel. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Wesley v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Van Dusen v. KindleburgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Linsman v. HugginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKibben v. MoriarityIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API