Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 1998No. 97-3368PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant challenges an order denying his 3.800(a) motion, alleging that because he was not given credit for time served in prison during the incarcerative portion of his split sentence towards his newly-imposed prison sentence of 22 years for violating probation, his sentence is illegal in that it exceeds the 30-year statutory maximum for a first-degree felony. Because the record indicates appellant was given prison credit for time served, and therefore his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum, we affirm. However, our affirmance is without prejudice to seek administrative…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grimes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Riddell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reeves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API