State Ex Rel. Burbridge v. St. John
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
It áppears that there is confusion as to the rationale of the action of this Court in the entry of its judgment of June 28, 1940.
The judgment of the court below was reversed and the cause remanded for further appropriate procedure.
It has not been held by this Court that the property involved is subject to taxation. Nor has it been held by the majority of the Court that it is exempt from taxation under the provisions of Section 16, Article XVI, of the Constitution. The majority of the Court does hold that under the pleadings in this case, the property is not shown to be exempt under that…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Saunders v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Lanier v. TysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Franks v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- City of St. Augustine, Florida v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Redford v. State, Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.