D.M.J. v. A.J.T.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Judge..D.M.J.1 (the Father) challenges various orders entered by the trial court following the final judgment of paternity. The Father contends, among other things, that the court failed to consider the statutory best interests of the child in entering the orders, on appeal. We agree and reverse.
■. A final judgment .of paternity was rendered..in July 2011 in .this. case. Incorporated into that final judgment were, a mediation agreement and a parenting plan. The parenting plan established a weekly rotating time-sharing schedule and provided that when the child became eligible for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perlow v. Berg-PerlowSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Wade v. HirschmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Bishop v. BishopDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Holland v. HollandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Halbert v. MoricoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.