Jackson Homestead Ass'n v. Zerlin

The facts are sufficiently stated in our original opinion.

On reconsideration of the testimony we have reached the conclusion that we were in error in reversing the finding of the district court, since that finding involved only questions of fact and was not manifestly erroneous.

Astute counsel for appellant had, in brief and oral argument on the first hearing, been most persuasive and had succeeded in convincing us that the contention that Latter had purchased the note was unreasonable and should not be accepted.

It is only alleged suspicious circumstances, however, to which counsel can point…