Legal Opinion

Fleischner v. Bank of McMinnville

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1898PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From Multnomah : Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Decided 24 October, 1898.

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

[54 Pac. 884.1

2Per curiam

1. This is a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that appellants have failed to specify the grounds of error relied upon for the reversal or modification of the decree appealed from, as required by Rules 4, 9 (24 Or. 595). The abstract was served and filed August 10 last, and respondents subsequently procured an extension of time within which to prepare and file their briefs, but before the extended period had expii'ed filed the motion in question to dismiss. When the matter was brought on for hearing, the counsel for…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Cross v. ChichesterOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Jackson v. McInnisOregon Supreme Court · 1898

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Portland Flour Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Williams v. Commercial National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Skinner's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. BLOUNT v. BlountMississippi Supreme Court · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API