Legal Opinion

Ahmi v. Waller

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the Ciecuit Court, Eiest Ciecuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

The action below was a statutory action to quiet the title to •a piece of land'at Kaakopua, Honolulu, covered by R. P. 217, L. C. A. 11076, issued to Kala'au. The plaintiff claimed by deed ■from a Mrs. Howland, who was Kalaau’s devisee. The defend■ants claimed through deeds made by Kalaau to one Alakema Naone, and by the latter to Kapika, who was Kalaau’s wife and who, after Kalaau’s death, married said Naone. These were the deeds that were the subject of the decision in Howland v. Naone, 5 Haw. 308.

Two alleged errors are relied on, namely, that the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Lovejoy v. LovettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Bell v. PrewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Booth v. BeckleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Thorndike v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1836

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chang v. Meaghers.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ka'upulehu Land LLC v. Heirs and Assigns of PahukulaHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kauaian Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API