Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Invoking the mechanism for state-federal judicial co-operation authorized by 4 M.R. S.A. § 57 (Supp.1982-1983) and M.R.Civ.P. 76B, the United States District Court for the District of Maine has certified to our court the following question of Maine law:
Is Maine’s comparative negligence statute, 14 M.R.S.A. § 156 [1980], applicable to plaintiff’s claim in this action based on 14 M.R.S.A. § 221 [1980]?
Our answer is yes, but in only the limited way described in this opinion.
I. Factual and Statutory Background
The certified question has arisen in the course of a federal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Henderson v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Lippard v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- King v. Kayak Manufacturing Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Dennis v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.