Legal Opinion
Fruchtman v. Manning
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 28, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendant Cyrus Manning is the son of the plaintiff. The plaintiff brought this action against him and his wife, Natalie Manning, alleging that the plaintiff had withdrawn $9000 from her bank account in Brooklyn, New York, and had delivered that sum to Cyrus in reliance on his representation that the interest rates paid by Connecticut banks were higher than those paid by New York banks, that it would be safer for her to withdraw the sum from her account in Brooklyn, and that he would deposit the money in a Connecticut bank in her name. It was further alleged that the representations were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Adamsen v. AdamsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Morrone v. JoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Slavitt v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Dimmock v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Salvio v. SalvioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Willametz v. GoldfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- United States v. The State National Bank Of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.