Smith v. Eliot Savings Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
These are actions of tort for malicious prosecution and trespass which were consolidated for trial to a jury in the Superior Court. At the conclusion of the evi- deuce the judge allowed motions for directed verdicts for the defendant. The cases are here on the plaintiff’s exceptions to the allowance of those motions and also to the exclusion from evidence of a certain document.
We state the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff. Miss Margaret V. Burns had a savings account with the defendant bank. On April 2, 7, 13, 17 and 24, 1964, withdrawals totaling $4,100 were made from her account. On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Higgins v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- White v. Apsley Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Smith v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Henriques v. Franklin Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carroll v. GillespieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Stromberg v. CostelloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
- Seelig v. Harvard Cooperative SocietyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Cuddy v. KuekerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Fletcher v. WagnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.