Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank M. Hill Machine Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 26, 1952No. Civ. A. 4867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought pursuant to § 403 of the Renegotiation Act, 56 Stat. 226, 245, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191, in which the United States is seeking to recover from the defendant excessive profits realized by it during the period from April 28, 1942 to December 21, 1942.

Findings of Fact.

On July 11, 1944 the Under Secretary of War acting under the authority of the Renegotiation Act determined that the defendant had realized excessive profits to the extent of $335,000 from April to December, 1942. It was allowed a tax credit of $268,528.73 from this sum by virtue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. United Drill & Tool Corp. United Drill & Tool Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Pownall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Ring Const. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API