Legal Opinion

Archey v. Carnahan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2012No. WD 75047PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

Janey Archey, ■ Jamala Rogers, Johnson Lancaster, and Justin M. Stein III (“Appellants”) appeal the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri (“trial court”), approving the summary statement of an initiative petition ballot title. In their sole point on appeal, Appellants assert that the trial court erred in finding that the summary statement certified by the Secretary of State was fair and sufficient. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

The Appellants brought a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the summary statement of the official ballot title…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Schroeder Ex Rel. Schroeder v. HorackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Brown v. Missouri Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys v. Barton CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Norman Seay v. Tim JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Jim Boeving v. Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander Missouri State Auditor Nicole Galloway, Raise Your Hand For Kids and Erin BrowerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Hill v. AshcroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Ritter v. Mo. Sec'y of State John AshcroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. County of Scotland v. Missouri Public Entity Risk Management FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API