Legal Opinion

Christman Estate

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided October 3, 1977No. 77053Published

1Opinion of the Court

SATTERTHWAITE, J., Specially Presiding,

Two previously undocumented questions arose at the audit hearings. One was the oral objection on behalf of Emma J. Destan, upon the presentation of accountants’ supplemental statement to the disbursement shown therein on September 21, 1976, of $1,000 to Lawrence Sager, Esq., as the “Balance due Tyson and Gingrich claim.” Miss Destan contends that this item was the individual obligation of James F. Christman (decedent’s son and a coexecutor) and should not have been charged against the estate account.

Upon due consideration, the auditing judge agrees with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Estate of DurhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API