Legal Opinion

People v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the imposition of consecutive sentences was not illegal. Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) based on his possession of a “dangerous or deadly instrument or weapon with intent to use the same unlawfully against another” (Penal Law § 265.01 [2]) and his previous conviction “of any crime” (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]). He was also convicted of assault in the second degree for intentionally causing serious physical injury to another person (Penal Law §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SalcedoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. MikeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. EstwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. MalaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API