People v. in the Interest of A.D.T.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GABRIEL.
A.D.T., a minor, appeals her adjudications for acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute unlawful sexual contact and harassment. Because we conclude that the juvenile court erred by failing to review in camera eight of the nine Department of Human Services (DHS) files of the victim in this case, by failing to disclose certain documents from the file that it did review, and by failing to make sufficient findings to support its refusal to disclose other documents, we reverse the juvenile court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings.
I. Background
On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. RoblesColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Zoll v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- People in the Interest of A.N-BColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- People v. HerreraColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Peo v. LoweColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.