Rottlund Company v. Pinnacle Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
The Rottlund Company, Inc. (Rottlund) appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for a new trial following a jury verdict adverse to its copyright infringement claim. Because we agree with Rott-lund’s contention that the district court erred in admitting certain expert testimony, we reverse and remand for a new trial. Appellees have filed a conditional cross appeal, arguing that if a new trial is granted, the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment should be reversed. The cross appeal is denied.
I
Rottlund is a production home builder that owns…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- moses.com Securities, Inc. v. Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc. William W. Simpson Southwest Securities, Inc. David Glatstein David ZeleniakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Well-Made Toy Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hartman v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Taylor Corporation v. Four Seasons Greetings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.