Catalano v. Catalano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*571The appeal from the intermediate order made in action No. 1 must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in that action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have *572been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Where, as here, there is a claim for equitable distribution in a divorce action and the court issues a restraining order enjoining both parties from disposing of or converting any of the assets held jointly by them pending the ultimate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Boronow v. BoronowNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Leibowits v. LeibowitsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Rigas v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Skiff-Murray v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Catalano v. CatalanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Greenpoint Savings Bank v. GuilianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Readick v. ReadickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Summer v. SummerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.