Legal Opinion

Simnitt v. Kneemeyer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1928No. 27,748PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiffs commenced this action to set aside the will of James H. Boettcher on the ground of undue influence exercised over him and on the ground that he did not have sufficient mental capacity to make a will. The action was tried without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants on the evidence introduced, and the plaintiffs appeal.

The only question argued is that judgment should have been rendered in favor of the plaintiffs on the evidence. They contend that undue influence was exercised over John H. Boettcher, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. WiswellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. Rodgers v. RodgersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Topeka Water-Supply Co. v. RootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. Lower v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fourth National Bank v. DiverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Snyder v. De RemerOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Peoples State Bank v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Strohmeier v. TuggleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API