Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stahl v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1983No. M-80-326, M-80-377 and M-80-328Published

1Dissent

BRETT, Judge:

I respectfully dissent to this decision.

The appellants in Case No. M-80-326, Stahl, et al., (Consolidated Cases CRM-79-407, 512, 635), Case No. M-80-328 Bernstein, et al., (Consolidated Cases CRM-79-373, 407, 437, 512, 540, 547, 561, 635, and 681 and Case No. M-80-377, Monks, et al., (Consolidated Cases CRM-79-373, 407, 437, 512, 540, 547, 561, 635 and 681), are nine newspersons who were convicted of the misdemeanor offense of Trespassing After Being Forbidden, in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 1835, in the District Court of Rogers County before the Honorable David Allen Box,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API