Legal Opinion

People v. Acevedo

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 2012No. B220081PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANEY, J.

The appellants were arrested on charges arising from seizures of over 350 kilograms of cocaine, 50 pounds of methamphetamine, 650 pounds of marijuana, firearms, and more than $1.2 million in illegal proceeds, *1046resulting from investigations involving court-authorized wiretaps. After being convicted on drug trafficking charges, they challenge the trial court’s refusal to compel discovery of redacted and sealed portions of the documentation supporting the wiretap authorization orders, and its refusal to suppress the resulting wiretap and other evidence that led to their arrest.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guerrero v. HestrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. Fao CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. Maddox CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API