Crawford v. Dahlenberg

This is an action for damages for breach of a contract to purchase a quantity of wool. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $2400 and defendant has appealed.

Defendant insists that his demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained; first, because the wool was purchased by a sample and upon representations as to quality and that the wool tendered did not comply with the sample or the representations; second, that the contract of purchase was not by the defendant Dahlenberg but by a corporation known as the St. Joseph Wool Company of which he was. president;…