Legal Opinion

McCue v. Finck

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to recover damages for negligence of defendants’ servants.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is against the executrix and executor of the estate of Andrew Finck, in their representative capacity and as individuals, to charge the estate and the defendants personally with the result of an accident alleged to have occurred by reason of the negligence of the defendants’ servant, whereby the plaintiff, a police officer, was run down and injured by a brewery truck driven by said employee. The ground upon which the plaintiff seeks to charge the defendants in their representative capacity is that the testator by his will directed that his business be conducted after his death by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. HazletonNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Pugsley v. AikinNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fetting v. WinchOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Fisher v. McNeelyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Moniot v. JacksonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  4. Watson v. MoriartyNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Blum v. DabritzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API