Legal Opinion

Barsland, Inc. v. Shaw

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1967No. 5157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*70OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

This is an action to recover damages for breach of a management contract. Ruth Shaw, plaintiff, claims that the contract was terminated without cause by Barsland, Inc., defendant. The case was tried to a jury. It favored Shaw with a verdict and fixed her damages at $18,900. Judgment was entered upon the verdict. This appeal by Barsland challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial result, and certain evidentiary rulings. It is our opinion that the challenges are unsound. Therefore, we affirm the judgment.

1. On January 9, 1963, Shaw and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Puget Sound National Bank v. McMahonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Simpson v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Robert A. Pierce Co. v. Sherman Gardens Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. WyattNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Steen v. GassNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. WyattNevada Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API