Legal Opinion

Boling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 10, 1971No. 55646PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

This is a declaratory judgment action by which Aetna Casualty and Surety Company asked that its automobile liability policy issued to Donald Boling be declared excess coverage to a similar policy issued by State Farm to Paul Hunt, d/b/a Hunt Materials Company. The occurrence which gave rise to the dispute between the two companies was an automobile accident in which Boling, the driver, with Hunt as a passenger in the right front seat, ran off the shoulder of the Foristel, Missouri, exit to Interstate 70, lost control of the car which then turned over and injured Hunt.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. HaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Parsons Construction Co. v. Missouri Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Gattavara v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Bankers Life Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. Brethren's Mutual Insurance v. HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burns v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Rigby Corp. v. Boatmen's Bank and Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Young v. Ray America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Lee Young v. Jack Boring's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Skelton v. General Candy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API