Legal Opinion

Transfer & Construction Co. v. Friedman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1956No. 3862PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Defendant, Arrel Friedman, doing business for the past several years as Arrel Friedman Transfer & Storage, appeals on questions of law and fact from a judgment of the court of common pleas permanently enjoining defendant from doing business under the name of “Arrel Friedman Transfer & Storage” and from using his name in conjunction with the words “transfer,” “hauling,” “cartage” and “construction,” “or any synonyms of such words, provided, however, that the defendant may use his own name either alone or in combination with words other than the words, or synonyms, above specified.”

The…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCoy v. McCoyCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1951

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. F.A.R. Food, Inc. v. R. Fresh, L.L.C., 06 Ma 149 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API