Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
| iTHIBODEAUX, Judge.
This ease is before us on remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court. The facts are fully delineated in our earlier opinion, Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer, 96-1344 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/21/97); 698 So.2d 408. The issue is whether damages for mental anguish are recoverable under La.Code Civ.P. art. 3608. A three-judge panel | aof our court held that the recovery of such damages is proper. Previously, Fontenot v. Petmecky, 386 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir.), unit denied, 393 So.2d 747 (La.1980), determined that no authority existed for the award of mental anguish damages under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Talley v. BradleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mathieu v. NettlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Henderson v. DomingueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Fontenot v. PetmeckyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. DeshazerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Succession of Harvey v. DietzenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Deshotels Plantation, LLC v. Torrent Gulf Coast, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Lyle E. Girouard v. Summit Financial Wealth Advisors,llcLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021