Rodgers v. After School Programs, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
We write to address the claim that the plaintiffs below were entitled to interview the jurors after trial to demonstrate that juror nondisclosure of information justified a new trial. We affirm and hold that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the interviews because the jurors’ failure to disclose the information, if any, were attributable to the plaintiffs’ lack of diligence in uncovering the information during voir dire.
The case below was a wrongful death action filed by Janet and Douglas Rodgers against After School Programs, Inc., which operated an after school care program at an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De La Rosa v. ZequeiraSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. MalerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Skiles v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Sterling v. FeldbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pembroke Lakes Mall Ltd. v. McGruderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. AlexanderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Hillsboro Management, LLC v. PagonoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Children's Medical Center, P.A. v. Jakyung KimDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Abazis v. Indian River CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.