Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moody v. Stem

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 30, 1948No. 16161Published

1ConcurrenceOxnER, Justice

It is alleged in the complaint that the defendants, who “are engaged in the business of housing, storing and selling tobacco as public licensed warehousemen”, charged and collected from plaintiff auction fees in excess of the rate fixed by statute. Under these circumstances plaintiff had an election to bring an action ex contractu to recover back the illegal overcharges exacted by the defendants, or to bring an action ex delicto for the breach of a duty imposed by statute. It has uniformly been held that where a public carrier charges and collects more than allowed by law, such exaction is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Lewis-Simas-Jones Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Hardaway v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Smith v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Koon v. Pioneer-Pyramid Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API