Legal Opinion

Opus Development Corp. v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1996No. LUBA 95-104; CA A92059PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

The City of Eugene seeks review of, and respondents 1 cross-petition from, LUBA’s decision remanding a series of ordinances and orders by the city that, among other things, amended the “refinement plan” for the Whiteaker neighborhood. The city’s actions entailed amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Diagram (general plan), of which the neighborhood refinement plans and inventories discussed here are a part. The actions also included decisions of a more operational and less comprehensive nature. The city assigns error to LUBA’s rejection of its application of Goal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Friends of Neabeack Hill v. City of PhilomathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Butler v. City of BandonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Save Oregon's Cape Kiwanda Organization v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Central Oregon Landwatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API