State v. Bartlett
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Memorandum Decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, filed November 10, 1988, vacated
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
In State v. Bartlett, 164 Ariz. 229, 240, 792 P.2d 692, 703 (1990) (hereinafter Bartlett I), we held that Joseph Bartlett, Jr.’s forty-year sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment to the United States Constitution. The case is back before this court because the United States Supreme Court vacated our opinion and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Harmelin v. Michigan, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Johnson v. State Hearing Examiner's OfficeWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- State v. LambertonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DePianoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.