Legal Opinion
Kamerman v. C. D. C. Furniture Manufacturing Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.
Motion is denied with, respect to adding a second cause of action on promissory notes and granted on consent to add parties, to correct names and errors and to supply omissions.
The primary object sought here is to permit the simultaneous maintenance of dual actions on the debt reflected by promissory notes secured by a mortgage being foreclosed, contrary to legislative policy (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1078) and long judicial history (Equitable Life Ins. Soc. v. Stevens, 63 N. Y. 341, 344; White v. Wielandt, 259 App. Div. 676, 681-682, affd. 286 N. Y. 609; President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Equitable Life Insurance Society of United States v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- White v. WielandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- White v. WielandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- President of Manhattan Co. v. Callister Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- President and Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Callister Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Light v. GranatellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Citibank, N. A. v. Covenant InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- D'Agostino v. Wheel Inn, Inc., New York County Courts1970
- Stern v. Itkin Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1975