Legal Opinion

MATTER OF CUNNINGHAM v. Regan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority below that there is substantial evidence to support the Comptroller’s determination that petitioner was not "actually in service” at the time of the filing of her application for ordinary disability as was then required by Retirement and Social Security Law § 62. Petitioner was neither actually working nor on authorized leave when she filed her application on January 7,1981, and the determination of her grievance in April 1981 resulted in her service being deemed to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cannavo v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Perritano v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Triolo v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Flaherty v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Williams v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API