Legal Opinion · Dissent

Henry Winston v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 28, 1962No. 27098_1Published

1DissentKaufman, Circuit Judge

Although the majority is “not unmindful of decisions elsewhere at variance” with its own, apparently it ascribes little significance to the fact that without exception every court which has considered this issue has held that the government is not liable for the negligence of its prison officials under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See James v. U. S., 280 F.2d 428 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 845, 81 S.Ct. 88, 5 L.Ed.2d 69 (1960) following Lack v. U. S., 262 F.2d 167 (8th Cir. 1958); Jones v. U. S., 249 F.2d 864 (7th Cir. 1957); Muniz v. U. S., 60 Civ. 1624, S.D.N.Y., Nov. 4, 1960, rev’d…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API