Henry Winston v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentKaufman, Circuit Judge
Although the majority is “not unmindful of decisions elsewhere at variance” with its own, apparently it ascribes little significance to the fact that without exception every court which has considered this issue has held that the government is not liable for the negligence of its prison officials under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See James v. U. S., 280 F.2d 428 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 845, 81 S.Ct. 88, 5 L.Ed.2d 69 (1960) following Lack v. U. S., 262 F.2d 167 (8th Cir. 1958); Jones v. U. S., 249 F.2d 864 (7th Cir. 1957); Muniz v. U. S., 60 Civ. 1624, S.D.N.Y., Nov. 4, 1960, rev’d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.