Legal Opinion

Schirmer v. Homestake Mining Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1994No. 21832PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

Claimant-Appellant, Helen Schirmer, appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Division of the New Mexico Department of Labor (the “Division”) granting summary judgment in favor of RespondentAppellee, Homestake Mining Company (“Homestake”), under NMSA 1978, Section 52-3-10(0 (Repl.Pamp.1991). On appeal, we address the constitutionality of Section 52-3-10(C), and hold that Section 52-3-10(0 is unconstitutional as it is currently enacted. Consequently, we vacate the Division’s order granting summary judgment for Homestake.

I

The facts in this case are undisputed. Mr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Espanola Housing Authority v. AtencioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Coleman v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Segura v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Di Luzio v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API