Legal Opinion

Dimmock v. South Peking Restaurant, No. Cv-91-0393743 (Nov. 7, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 7, 1991No. CV-91-0393743Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST SPECIAL DEFENSE This is an action under the Dram Shop Act, Gen. Stats.30-102, in which plaintiff passenger claims damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident caused by the negligence of the operator, who allegedly was served alcoholic beverages by the defendant restaurant while he was already intoxicated. Defendant, in its first special defense, claims that plaintiff participated with the operator in the consumption of alcoholic beverages and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Passini v. DeckerConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
  2. Beckwith v. BeersConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
  3. Beckwith v. CarneyConnecticut Superior Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API