Legal Opinion

Searcy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1899No. 1967; 1967; 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Karnes. Tried below before Hon. F. Theo. Barnes, County Judge. Appeal from a conviction for selling a bottle of whisky on Sunday; penalty, a fine of $30.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

The Assistant Attorney-General has filed the following motion for writ of certiorari:

1. Now comes the State of Texas, by the Assistant Attorney-General, in the above styled and numbered cause, and shows to the court that the transcript filed herein is imperfect in this:

That it fails to comply with rule 114 for the district courts of this State,- which apply and control the making of transcripts herein, in that the same is not legible.

2. The State would show to the court, that on page 2 of said transcript, what purports to he a copy of the indictment is written by a typewriter,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gholson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API