Shult v. Travis
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Upon a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Ohio county.
1Opinion of the Court
It seems to the court that the first, second, and sixth errors, ■assigned do not exist, and that the fourth, fifth, and seventh are not material. So that it only remains to decide on the third, as: *141deserving of more particular attention, it is as follows: copies of the award on which this judgment is founded were not delivered to the parties. From the act concerning awards, several things are required of arbitrators either expressly or by implication, which neither that act nor the general principles of law require to be stated in an award such as issuing subpenas for witnesses on application…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Green v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
- Taylor v. NeblettTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
- Taylor v. NeblettTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
- Green v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
- Green v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.