Legal Opinion
Rutland v. Swift Chemical Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1977No. 49996PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
351 So.2d 324 (1977)
Thomas E. RUTLAND
v.
SWIFT CHEMICAL COMPANY.
No. 49996.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
October 26, 1977.
Jack A. Morris, Monticello, Joseph M. Stinson, Tylertown, for appellant.
Thomas, Price, Alston, Jones & Davis, Alex A. Alston, Jr., Jackson, Lawrence J. Casazza, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before SMITH, BROOM and LEE, JJ.
BROOM, Justice, for the Court:
Breach of implied warranty of merchantability or fitness is the theory of Rutland's (appellant's) suit against Swift Chemical Company (appellee) for damages related to poor performance of fertilizer manufactured by Swift and sold…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Beckmire v. Ristokrat Clay Products Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Williams v. Carroll Foods, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Certainteed Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sara R. Alexander, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Alvin A. Alexander, Deceased v. Conveyors & Dumpers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Crouch v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1988
- Taylor v. Ford Motor CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Carlisle v. FetzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.