Legal Opinion

Gwathmey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1954No. 14377PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

Appellants 1 have appealed from the judgments in two consolidated condemnation suits. The group appellants list 76 alleged errors which they reduce into 14 questions. Fischer, the individual appellant, raised many of the same questions and four additional errors. But the principal issue, and the main problem we deem it necessary to discuss, was raised by all appellants: Did the trial judge exercise a proper discretion first, in consolidating the two suits, and second, in refusing appellants’ requests for separate trials and allowing the case to be presented before one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. ArmondMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. United States v. Allied Stevedoring Corp., John Ward, John Potter and Michael BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Standard Oil Company of California v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., and Morgan Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API