Matter of Dann v. Town of Veteran
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The policy in question provides that the company is directly and primarily liable to injured employees. Having by indorsement of its policy expressly covered the claimant by name as an employee, in consideration of a premium agreed to be paid therefor, it cannot after an accident be relieved of liability upon the ground that as to him the policy is void because in fact he was not an employee.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Lottghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Claim of Burns v. Merritt Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
- MATTER OF PERRY v. Town of Cherry ValleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Claim of Clarke v. Town of RussiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Claim of Feldman v. A. B. C. Vending Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Claim of Van Buren v. Town of RichmondvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.