Legal Opinion

Ringgenberg v. Wilmsmeyer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1977No. 11769, 11855Published

1Opinion of the Court

253 N.W.2d 197 (1977)

Allen RINGGENBERG, d/b/a Ringgenberg Electric, Plaintiff,

v.

Melvin S. WILMSMEYER et al., Defendants,

George E. Tarver & Marjorie S. Tarver, Defendants, Appellants and Cross-Respondents,

Versa-Tech et al., Defendants, Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 11769, 11855.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued November 19, 1976.

Decided April 29, 1977.

Maloney, Kolker, Kolker & Fritz, Daniel R. Fritz, Aberdeen, for defendant-appellant.

King & King, Rory King, Aberdeen, for defendants, respondents and cross-appellants.

WINANS, Justice.[*]

This controversy involves the proper application…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Guldberg v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Crescent Electric Supply Co. v. NerisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Thurston v. Cedric Sanders CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Utschig v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API