Duckett v. MAYOR OF OCEAN SPRINGS
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1DissentCarlton, J.
¶ 17. Po-boys and gumbo constitute types of food.3 Therefore, I must respectfully dissent and submit that the City of Ocean Springs’ (“the City”) interpretation of the zoning ordinance was logically based on the plain language of the ordinance. I agree with the City’s position that it was merely interpreting its zoning ordinance.
¶ 18. In this case, the City determined the intended use qualified under the ordinance as a permitted use in the C-4-B zone at issue. This C-4-B zone permitted use allows, on its face, services and supplies, including food and beverages, for boats and watercraft that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barbour v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Jones v. City of HattiesburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
- Stroud v. City of AspenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- City of Jackson v. RidgwayMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.