Legal Opinion

Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1997No. 95-2453PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the BTA’s ultimate factual conclusion that Donauschwaben is a charitable institution. SFZ Transp., Inc. v. Limbach (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 602, 604-605, 613 N.E.2d 1037, 1039-1040. We hold, instead, that Donauschwaben is not a charitable institution. It is, as the BOE argues, a fraternal, social organization. Furthermore, we hold that Donauschwaben does not use this property exclusively for charitable purposes.

R.C. 5709.12(B) states:

“ * * * Real * * * property belonging to institutions that is used exclusively for charitable purposes shall be exempt from taxation.”

Former R.C.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White Cross Hospital Ass'n v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Wehrle Foundation v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Tax CommissionerOhio Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Church of God in Northern Ohio, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bethesda Healthcare, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Community Health Professionals, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Church of God in Northern Ohio, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Church of God in Northern Ohio, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API