Legal Opinion

League of Women Voters v. Blackwell

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 20, 2004No. 3:04CV7622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, District Judge.

This is a suit by organizations challenging directives issued by the defendant, J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio’s Secretary of State and, in that capacity, Ohio’s chief election officer. Plaintiffs claim that two directives issued by Blackwell contravene provisions of the Help America Vote Act Pub.L. 107-252, Title III, § 302, 116 Stat. 1706 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15301, et seq.) (HAVA). Pending are plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction and defendant’s motion to dismiss.

For the reasons that follow, I conclude that Directive 2004-7 does not contravene HAVA, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Sugarman v. DougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Local Union No. 12004, United Steelworkers v. MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Tex. v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. North Carolina State Conference of NAACP v. McCroryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  3. COMMONG CAUSE/GEORGIA v. BillupsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
  4. Planned Parenthood v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API