Legal Opinion

Reichmann v. Bater

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 11, 1892Published

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Aethoey, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

This is an action for negligence, as the abstract of the evidence shows. The declaration is not abstracted. There was no motion in arrest, nor is there any assignment of error which questions the sufficiency of the declaration. Whether the declaration is good or not is not a question before us. Jansen v. Siddal, 41 Ill. App. 279.

There was a funeral procession in which was a carriage of the appellant, the off fore wheel of which struck the near hind wheel of a buggy in which the appellee and her husband were riding, in consequence of which she fell out and was injured. The verdict was in her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petefish, Skiles & Co. v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jansen v. SiddalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API