Railroad v. Parks
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM DYER. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Dyer County. T. J. Elippin, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.
These four suits at law against subscribers to the stock of the Paducah & Memphis Railroad Co. were tried by consent together; and, a jury being waived, the issues of law and fact were submitted to the Circuit Judge, who has filed his special findings of fact and law as part of the record. There was a judgment in favor of each of the defendants, and an appeal by the plaintiffs.
The contract of subscription upon which the suit was brought was as follows:
“July 81st, 1872. — We, the subscribers, agree and bind ourselves, our heirs and legal representatives, to pay to the Paducah & Memphis…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Davis v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- City of Cincinnati v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Goldsborough v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Lake Ontario Shore R.R. Co. v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crouch v. GrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Lewis v. TurnleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Sullivan v. FarnsworthTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Eastern Products Corporations v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Coos Bay R. R. v. NoslerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.