Legal Opinion
In re Unioil Securities Litigation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 29, 1985No. Nos. CV 84-2359-PAR, CV 84-2400-PAR and CV 84-2496-PARPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
RYMER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(1), named plaintiffs Jacob Deutsche and Thomas Wilson move for certification of a class of plaintiffs to be defined as follows: All persons who during the period August 18, 1983 through February 3, 1984 purchased the common stock of Unioil on the open market and were damaged thereby, excluding Unioil, J.W. Weller & Co., Howard Bronson & Co., the individual defendants and their heirs, successors, assigns, partners or principals and those who purchased to cover short sales.
Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- In Re Seagate Technology II Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- O'Neil v. AppelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.